Ridley Scott’s Cinematic Endeavor
Ridley Scott’s much-anticipated film, “Napoleon” (2023), premiered globally in November this year, marking the 28th feature film from the renowned British director, who celebrates his 86th birthday on November 30. The film’s buzz stems not only from Scott’s acclaim but also from the inclusion of actors like Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby. However, the central intrigue lies in the focus on the life of Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821). With preconceived notions abounding regarding this iconic figure, especially in the Anglo-Saxon world where the name varies in pronunciation and portrayal, the expectations surrounding a production depicting a segment of such a celebrated figure’s life can significantly influence reception, particularly evident in foreign media.
Joaquin Phoenix and the Interpretation of Napoleon
If one regards Napoleon as a “significant statesman,” appreciating Scott’s film might be a challenge. Conversely, for those envisioning Napoleon as “an ordinary soldier who ascended to power and declared himself emperor,” the film might hold more appeal. Audience expectations of a “Napoleon film” play a crucial role; if anticipating “grand-scale, vast battle scenes with thousands of extras,” Scott’s film doesn’t fulfill this anticipation. Especially for those familiar with epics like “Ben-Hur” or Sergey Bondarchuk’s “War and Peace,” the contrast with the battles in “Braveheart” seems remarkably well-executed compared to “Napoleon” (2023). The film sporadically hints at “grand-scale battle scenes,” primarily towards its conclusion. However, it doesn’t embrace the vastness often anticipated. Moreover, for those seeking a personal exploration of Napoleon’s life rather than a war film, Scott’s portrayal might fall short, especially as the film commences in Napoleon’s twenties, lacking depth in portraying his relationship with Joséphine.
Napoleon and Historical Accuracy
While cinema isn’t the sole source for in-depth knowledge of influential historical figures, a film depicting a historical figure cannot arbitrarily deviate from established facts. Therefore, my reservation towards Scott’s “Napoleon” doesn’t solely stem from its deviation from historical facts or its portrayal of Napoleon as a statesman but rather the film’s flat trajectory, its failure to decisively highlight facets of Napoleon’s life or personality. However, addressing certain historical inconsistencies highlighted in foreign critiques is pertinent.
The film’s exaggerated portrayal of the 1789 French Revolution at its outset contrasts starkly with the historical calmness of its initial stages. Notably, while the depiction of Marie Antoinette’s execution on October 16, 1793, is realistic, the film conveys a constant fervor throughout the revolution, which historically had more tranquil phases. Critiques in the French media emphasize the inaccuracy of Marie Antoinette’s hair length during her execution, yet Scott and screenwriter David Scarpa might have aimed to allude to the myth of her hair turning white within days before execution due to stress, a cinematic choice plausible in visual storytelling.
The film somewhat skirts the myth of Napoleon’s short stature, briefly addressing it during a scene related to the Egyptian Campaign. Napoleon’s actual height of 167.5 cm contradicts the prevalent British press portrayal of “Little Boney,” yet this image persisted widely outside France. However, the film’s weaknesses don’t primarily stem from historical inconsistencies but rather its lack of a cohesive narrative or essence. Unlike films like “Amadeus,” “Braveheart,” or “The Music Lovers,” where viewers connect empathetically or witness compelling character transformations, Scott’s “Napoleon” lacks a discernible hook or impactful storytelling. Notably, Vanessa Kirby’s portrayal of Joséphine stands out as the sole element in the film capable of engaging the audience emotionally.
Performances: Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby’s Portrayals
While Joaquin Phoenix delivers a commendable performance, his portrayal might suffer from the film’s lack of a definitive direction. In contrast, Vanessa Kirby’s depiction of Joséphine exudes depth and detail, offering more insight into Napoleon’s life than the film itself. The subtlety and expressiveness in Kirby’s acting become the film’s standout quality. The supporting cast, including Rupert Everett, Tahar Rahim, Ben Miles, Miles Jupp, and Paul Rhys, delivers notable performances.
Napoleon in Cinema: A Historical Perspective
Reflecting on cinematic depictions of Napoleon, Abel Gance’s 1927 silent film “Napoleon” and Sacha Guitry’s 1955 rendition stand out as notable portrayals. Additionally, though not solely centered on Napoleon, Soviet director Sergey Bondarchuk’s “War and Peace” and “Waterloo” present significant cinematic representations. While these films diverge in focus, they indirectly shed light on Napoleon’s legacy.
Ridley Scott’s Vision and Future Expectations
Ridley Scott‘s recent announcement regarding a four-hour “director’s cut” potentially alters the film’s essence significantly. Similar to how different cuts transformed films like “The Wicker Man,” additional footage might redefine the perception of Scott’s “Napoleon.” Considering the varied opinions on Napoleon himself, personal expectations will likely influence one’s perception of this film. However, for those seeking standout performances, Vanessa Kirby and Joaquin Phoenix offer compelling portrayals. For an exemplary Ridley Scott film, exploring his works like “Alien,” “Thelma & Louise,” “Gladiator,” “The Last Duel,” or his debut film “The Duellists” might provide a more fulfilling cinematic experience. Here’s to abundant cinematic adventures ahead!
action adventure biography Joaquin Phoenix movies Napoleon reviews Ridley Scott Vanessa Kirby
Last modified: December 31, 2023
